Aggregate signal brief
Recurring strengths, assumptions, and decision friction—without turning one score into an employee verdict.
Human judgment for AI-enabled teams
AI can produce an answer. Can your team defend the decision?
ThinkProof makes hidden judgment habits visible—how people test evidence, calibrate confidence, challenge assumptions, and decide when to escalate.
For enterprise teams
Run a bounded sprint with practical outputs.
Explore the pilot →For individuals
Take a free 12–15 minute judgment challenge.
Start free →For responsible buyers
Review the method, limits, and data boundaries.
Review the trust model →What the sponsor receives
A decision-readiness signal your team can act on.
One fixed-scope engagement turns realistic AI-assisted decisions into a shared language for better verification, escalation, and accountability.
See the full enterprise path →Facilitated decision lab
A 60-minute working session built around how teams trust, verify, challenge, and escalate.
Action memo
Three concrete next steps for learning, workflow design, or governance.
What it examines
Five signals behind defensible judgment.
ThinkProof does not test whether you can prompt an AI. It examines whether you can challenge one without becoming blindly trusting—or blindly skeptical.
Evidence discrimination
Separate strong evidence from persuasive-looking noise.
Confidence calibration
Match confidence to what the available evidence can support.
Assumption detection
Notice what an AI answer quietly treats as settled fact.
Decision discipline
Know when to act, pause, verify, escalate, or reject.
Explainability
Defend a decision in language another human can challenge.
Your result
More useful than a score. A profile you can act on.
Your Human Judgment Profile shows where your reasoning is disciplined, where confidence runs ahead of evidence, and which habit to practise next.
- ✓ Clear strengths and watch-outs
- ✓ Scenario-level reasoning feedback
- ✓ A practical next-step experiment
Developmental feedback, not a pass/fail verdict or employment assessment.
Sample profile
The Constructive Challenger
78/ 100
Human Judgment Index
Strong, with one visible blind spotYou challenge claims well, but occasionally accept numerical precision as proof of reliability.
Next practiceBefore accepting a precise number, ask how it was produced and what was excluded.
The experience
Short enough to finish. Serious enough to reveal a pattern.
Decide
Face realistic AI-assisted decisions
Each scenario contains enough truth to feel plausible—and enough uncertainty to require judgment.
Defend
Explain what your decision rests on
Your reasoning matters as much as the option you select.
Develop
Receive a practical profile
Leave with one concrete way to make your next AI-assisted decision more defensible.
For individuals
Discover how you think with AI.
Take the challenge anonymously and receive a developmental Human Judgment Profile.
Start the challenge →For organizations
Build judgment before AI dependence becomes invisible.
Run a controlled pilot, learn where teams need support, and discuss aggregate patterns without turning one score into a hiring shortcut. Founder-led pilots are available now.
Founding offer · Fixed scope
The AI Decision Readiness Sprint
A practical first engagement for a team that is already using AI—or about to—and needs better judgment habits around it.
$1,250founding-pilot price
Request a founding pilot →What the engagement includes
01
Up to 12 participantsOne bounded challenge cohort with clear developmental-purpose communication.
02
Aggregate signal briefA concise view of recurring strengths, assumptions, and decision friction.
03
60-minute facilitated labA live session that turns patterns into better team decision habits.
04
Action memoThree concrete actions for governance, learning, or workflow design.
Founder-led delivery · Designed for completion within 10 business days after kickoff · Not an employee-screening product
Trust by design
Your reasoning deserves more care than a black-box score.
Scoring inputs exclude direct identity fields. Uncertain cases are designed for human review. ThinkProof is not presented as a validated hiring or psychological assessment.
See the trust model →One question worth answering